linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: pmd_mkinvalid() must handle swap pmds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8645f1a3-1d8c-4883-bbfa-6bdf5b9451af@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:25:15 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>,
 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: pmd_mkinvalid() must handle swap pmds

On 30/04/2024 17:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:04:32PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 30/04/2024 14:55, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> But it might be worth splitting the tests from the fix to make backporting
>>> easier.
>>
>> Yes good point. I'll leave this hanging for today to see if any more comments
>> come in, and will re-post tomorrow as 2 patches. I assume we need to go fast to
>> catch 6.9.
> 
> Yes, I'll pick it up for 6.9. I can drop the tests from the patch (and
> their mention in the log) and you can post your tests separately to go
> via Andrew's tree.
> 

Yep that works for me! thanks.