[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6hxrlzj7ycrcodkmq4hrbxvdpcqet2wvckjit3xeewxjkavwp@zb2uxoxeqs6p>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:45:06 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...a.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] memcg: reduce memory for the lruvec and memcg
stats
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:30:51AM -0700, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > +
> > +static inline int memcg_stats_index(int idx)
> > +{
> > + return mem_cgroup_stats_index[idx] - 1;
>
> Could this just be: return mem_cgroup_stats_index[idx];
> with a postfix increment of j in init_memcg_stats instead of prefix increment?
>
The -1 is basically for error checking but I will do a followup patch to
initialize the array/indirection-table with -1 and remove the
subtraction from the fast path.
Thanks for the review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists