[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g7omX=OcObvEAs=ArpW9s+C8CvuW7Ew5EzQfuVDhpZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:31:18 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: Move acpi_blacklisted() declaration to asm/acpi.h
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:58 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 09:04:41PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> > The function acpi_blacklisted() is defined only when CONFIG_X86 is
> > enabled and is only used by X86 arch code. To align with its usage and
> > definition conditions, move its declaration to asm/acpi.h
>
> FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
I have replaced the v1 that was applied some time ago with this one.
> ...
>
> > extern char acpi_video_backlight_string[];
> > extern long acpi_is_video_device(acpi_handle handle);
> > -extern int acpi_blacklisted(void);
>
> I would replace it with a blank line (to me it seems the above and below are
> different groups from semantic point of view, but Rafael may correct me).
And I have added the blank line as suggested.
> > extern void acpi_osi_setup(char *str);
> > extern bool acpi_osi_is_win8(void);
>
> --
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists