lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:15:27 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: use spi_valid_{tx,rx}buf() in stats function

There are macros spi_valid_txbuf() and spi_valid_rxbuf() for determining
if an xfer actually intended to send or receive data.

These checks were hard-coded in spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(). We
can make use of the macros instead to make the code more readable and
more robust against potential future changes in case the definition of
what valid means changes.

The macro takes the spi_message as an argument, so we need to change
spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats() to take the spi_message as an
argument instead of the controller.

Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 34fca94b2b5b..a500a4137a78 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *spi_master_groups[] = {
 
 static void spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(struct spi_statistics __percpu *pcpu_stats,
 					      struct spi_transfer *xfer,
-					      struct spi_controller *ctlr)
+					      struct spi_message *msg)
 {
 	int l2len = min(fls(xfer->len), SPI_STATISTICS_HISTO_SIZE) - 1;
 	struct spi_statistics *stats;
@@ -328,11 +328,9 @@ static void spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(struct spi_statistics __percpu *pc
 	u64_stats_inc(&stats->transfer_bytes_histo[l2len]);
 
 	u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, xfer->len);
-	if ((xfer->tx_buf) &&
-	    (xfer->tx_buf != ctlr->dummy_tx))
+	if (spi_valid_txbuf(msg, xfer))
 		u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes_tx, xfer->len);
-	if ((xfer->rx_buf) &&
-	    (xfer->rx_buf != ctlr->dummy_rx))
+	if (spi_valid_rxbuf(msg, xfer))
 		u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes_rx, xfer->len);
 
 	u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
@@ -1618,8 +1616,8 @@ static int spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
 	list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
 		trace_spi_transfer_start(msg, xfer);
 
-		spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(statm, xfer, ctlr);
-		spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(stats, xfer, ctlr);
+		spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(statm, xfer, msg);
+		spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(stats, xfer, msg);
 
 		if (!ctlr->ptp_sts_supported) {
 			xfer->ptp_sts_word_pre = 0;

base-commit: cecfc48904cfd3d518bd4dad13c70291e6741076
-- 
2.43.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ