lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 00:33:05 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
	lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Srikanth Aithal <sraithal@....com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/alternatives] [x86/alternatives] ee8962082a:
 WARNING:at_arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c:#do_clear_cpu_cap

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:51:02PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> But that would just mask the underlying problem, it wouldn't actually fix anything
> other than making the WARN go away.  Unless I'm misreading the splat+code, the
> issue isn't that init_ia32_feat_ctl() clears VMX late, it's that the BSP sees
> VMX as fully enabled, but at least one AP sees VMX as disabled.
> 
> I don't see how the kernel can expect to function correctly with divergent feature
> support across CPUs, i.e. the WARN is a _good_ thing in this case, because it
> alerts the user that their system is messed up, e.g. has a bad BIOS or something.

Yes, and yes.

There are two issues. Clearing feature flags after alternatives have
been applied should not happen, and this particular issue with that box.

Lemme cook up something in the coming days for the former.

As to the box having misconfigured VMX settings, dmesg says:

[    0.055225][    T0] x86/cpu: VMX (outside TXT) disabled by BIOS

which means this:

	(!tboot && !(msr & FEAT_CTL_VMX_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX))) {

so... I have no clue what needs to happen here. BIOS update...

I hope we won't try to do some nasty fix for b0rked BIOSes again...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ