linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/17] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-fsi: Convert to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bbf12675-e0f5-4150-96d1-097eb7abd81a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:35:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, lakshmiy@...ibm.com, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, joel@....id.au,
 andrew@...econstruct.com.au, andi.shyti@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/17] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-fsi: Convert to
 json-schema

On 29/04/2024 23:01, Eddie James wrote:
> Convert to json-schema for the FSI-attached I2C controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
>  - Update MAINTAINERS
>  - Change commit message to match similar commits
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-fsi.txt       | 40 -------------
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/ibm,i2c-fsi.yaml  | 58 +++++++++++++++++++


Please split independent patches to separate patchsets, so they can be
reviewed and picked up by respective maintainers.

I don't see any dependency here. Neither in 1st patch.


>  MAINTAINERS                                   |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-fsi.txt
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/ibm,i2c-fsi.yaml
> 

..

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/ibm,i2c-fsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/ibm,i2c-fsi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8ff5585a3aa5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/ibm,i2c-fsi.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/ibm,i2c-fsi.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: IBM FSI-attached I2C controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  This I2C controller is an FSI CFAM engine, providing access to a number of
> +  I2C busses. Therefore this node will always be a child of an FSI CFAM node.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - ibm,i2c-fsi
> +
> +  reg:
> +    items:
> +      - description: FSI slave address
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml#
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    i2c@...0 {
> +        compatible = "ibm,i2c-fsi";
> +        reg = <0x1800 0x400>;
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        i2c-bus@0 {
> +            reg = <0>;
> +            #address-cells = <1>;
> +            #size-cells = <0>;

This does not look right. Why do you have multiple i2c-bus children? I
do not think i2c-controller.yaml schema allows this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof