| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240430111341.00003dba@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:13:41 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<x86@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>, "James Morse"
<james.morse@....com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Jean-Philippe
Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier
<maz@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <justin.he@....com>,
<jianyong.wu@....com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "Sudeep
Holla" <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability
of acpi_processor earlier
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:28:38 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:17:24 +1000
> Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 4/26/24 23:51, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that
> > > they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access
> > > to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add()
> > > and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot
> > > be checked).
> > >
> > > Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after
> > > arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in
> > > there as well.
> > >
> > > Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to
> > > acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures
> > > must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID
> > > is valid (not hotplug path).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > v8: On buggy bios detection when setting per_cpu structures
> > > do not carry on.
> > > Fix up the clearing of per cpu structures to remove unwanted
> > > side effects and ensure an error code isn't use to reference them.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > > index ba0a6f0ac841..3b180e21f325 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > > @@ -183,8 +183,38 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {}
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
> > >
> > > /* Initialization */
> > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
> > > +
> > > +static bool acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> > > + struct acpi_device *device)
> > > +{
> > > + BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
> >
> > One blank line after BUG_ON() if we need to follow original implementation.
>
> Sure unintentional - I'll put that back.
>
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Buggy BIOS check.
> > > + * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
> > > + * Don't trust it blindly
> > > + */
> > > + if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
> > > + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
> > > + dev_warn(&device->dev,
> > > + "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
> > > + pr->id);
> > > + /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
> >
> > It depends on how the return value is handled by the caller if the namespace
> > is continued to be scanned. The caller can be acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
> > and acpi_processor_get_info() after this patch is applied. So I think this
> > specific comment need to be moved to the caller.
>
> Good point. This gets messy and was an unintended change.
>
> Previously the options were:
> 1) acpi_processor_get_info() failed for other reasons - this code was never called.
> 2) acpi_processor_get_info() succeeded without acpi_processor_hotadd_init (non hotplug)
> this code then ran and would paper over the problem doing a bunch of cleanup under err.
> 3) acpi_processor_get_info() succeeded with acpi_processor_hotadd_init called.
> This code then ran and would paper over the problem doing a bunch of cleanup under err.
>
> We should maintain that or argue cleanly against it.
>
> This isn't helped the the fact I have no idea which cases we care about for that bios
> bug handling. Do any of those bios's ever do hotplug? Guess we have to try and maintain
> whatever protection this was offering.
>
> Also, the original code leaks data in some paths and I have limited idea
> of whether it is intentional or not. So to tidy the issue up that you've identified
> I'll need to try and make that code consistent first.
>
> I suspect the only way to do that is going to be to duplicate the allocations we
> 'want' to leak to deal with the bios bug detection.
>
> For example acpi_processor_get_info() failing leaks pr and pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map
> before this series. After this series we need pr to leak because it's used for the detection
> via processor_device_array.
>
> I'll work through this but it's going to be tricky to tell if we get right.
> Step 1 will be closing the existing leaks and then we will have something
> consistent to build on.
>
I 'think' that fixing the original leaks makes this all much more straight forward.
That return 0 for acpi_processor_get_info() never made sense as far as I can tell.
The pr isn't used after this point.
What about something along lines of.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 161c95c9d60a..97cff4492304 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -392,8 +392,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
device->driver_data = pr;
result = acpi_processor_get_info(device);
- if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
- return 0;
+ if (result) { /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
+ result = 0;
+ goto err_free_throttling_mask;
+ }
BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
@@ -408,7 +410,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
"BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
pr->id);
/* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
- goto err;
+ goto err_clear_driver_data;
}
/*
* processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
@@ -420,12 +422,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id);
if (!dev) {
result = -ENODEV;
- goto err;
+ goto err_clear_per_cpu;
}
result = acpi_bind_one(dev, device);
if (result)
- goto err;
+ goto err_clear_per_cpu;
pr->dev = dev;
@@ -436,10 +438,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
dev_err(dev, "Processor driver could not be attached\n");
acpi_unbind_one(dev);
- err:
- free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map);
- device->driver_data = NULL;
+ err_clear_per_cpu:
per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
+ err_clear_driver_data:
+ device->driver_data = NULL;
+ err_free_throttling_mask:
+ free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map);
err_free_pr:
kfree(pr);
return result;
Then the diff on this patch is simply:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 3c49eae1e943..3b75f5aeb7ab 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ static bool acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr,
dev_warn(&device->dev,
"BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
pr->id);
- /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
return false;
}
/*
@@ -230,13 +229,14 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
goto out;
if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
goto out;
}
ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id);
if (ret) {
- /* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */
+x /* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */
per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
goto out;
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */
-static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
+static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device, bool bios_bug)
{
union acpi_object object = { 0 };
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
return ret;
} else {
if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device))
- return 0;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
/*
> >
> > Besides, it seems acpi_processor_set_per_cpu() isn't properly called and
> > memory leakage can happen. More details are given below.
> >
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > + /*
> > > + * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
> > > + * checks.
> > > + */
> > > + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
> > > + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > > -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > > +static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> > > + struct acpi_device *device)
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -198,8 +228,15 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > + if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device)) {
> > > + acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > With the 'goto out', zero is returned from acpi_processor_hotadd_init() to acpi_processor_get_info().
Indeed a bug :(
> > The zero return value is carried from acpi_map_cpu() in acpi_processor_hotadd_init(). If I'm correct,
> > we need return errno from acpi_processor_get_info() to acpi_processor_add() so that cleanup can be
> > done. For example, the cleanup corresponding to the 'err' tag can be done in acpi_processor_add().
> > Otherwise, we will have memory leakage.
The confusion here was that previously acpi_processor_add() was missing error cleanup for
acpi_processor_get_info(). With that in place I think it's all much simpler.
Thanks for your eagle eyes!
Jonathan
> >
> > > ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > + /* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */
> > > + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
> > > acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > > @@ -217,7 +254,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > #else
> > > -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > > +static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> > > + struct acpi_device *device)
> > > {
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > }
> > > @@ -316,10 +354,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
> > > */
> > > if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
> > > - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
> > > + int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
> > >
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device))
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > For non-hotplug case, we still need pass the error to acpi_processor_add() so that
> > cleanup corresponding 'err' tag can be done. Otherwise, we will have memory leakage.
> >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -365,8 +406,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc.
> > > * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe().
> > > */
> > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
> > > -
> > > static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > > const struct acpi_device_id *id)
> > > {
> > > @@ -395,28 +434,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > > if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * Buggy BIOS check.
> > > - * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
> > > - * Don't trust it blindly
> > > - */
> > > - if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
> > > - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
> > > - dev_warn(&device->dev,
> > > - "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
> > > - pr->id);
> > > - /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
> > > - goto err;
> > > - }
> > > - /*
> > > - * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
> > > - * checks.
> > > - */
> > > - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
> > > - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;
> > > -
> > > dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id);
> > > if (!dev) {
> > > result = -ENODEV;
> > > @@ -469,10 +486,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > device_release_driver(pr->dev);
> > > acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev);
> > >
> > > - /* Clean up. */
> > > - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL;
> > > - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
> > > -
> > > cpu_maps_update_begin();
> > > cpus_write_lock();
> > >
> > > @@ -480,6 +493,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
> > > acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id);
> > >
> > > + /* Clean up. */
> > > + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL;
> > > + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
> > > +
> > > cpus_write_unlock();
> > > cpu_maps_update_done();
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gavin
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists