linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] bpf: do not walk twice the hash map on free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aqjmjzyiip3fmyivrnn3uvz7qbao3xbvazkaztd5wamubzqaaf@24wrep4lmbqp>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:39:38 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] bpf: do not walk twice the hash map on free

On Apr 30 2024, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> If someone stores both a timer and a workqueue in a hash map, on free, we
> would walk it twice.
> Add a check in htab_free_malloced_timers_or_wq and free the timers
> and workqueues if they are present.
> 
> Fixes: 246331e3f1ea ("bpf: allow struct bpf_wq to be embedded in arraymaps and hashmaps")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> changes in v2:
> - fix wq being not freed (and static call not used)
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 49 +++++++++++++------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index 0179183c543a..5eefadfc8ea9 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -221,32 +221,11 @@ static bool htab_has_extra_elems(struct bpf_htab *htab)
>  	return !htab_is_percpu(htab) && !htab_is_lru(htab);
>  }
>  
> -static void htab_free_prealloced_timers(struct bpf_htab *htab)
> +static void htab_free_prealloced_timers_and_wq(struct bpf_htab *htab)
>  {
>  	u32 num_entries = htab->map.max_entries;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (!btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_TIMER))
> -		return;
> -	if (htab_has_extra_elems(htab))
> -		num_entries += num_possible_cpus();
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
> -		struct htab_elem *elem;
> -
> -		elem = get_htab_elem(htab, i);
> -		bpf_obj_free_timer(htab->map.record, elem->key + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8));
> -		cond_resched();
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -static void htab_free_prealloced_wq(struct bpf_htab *htab)
> -{
> -	u32 num_entries = htab->map.max_entries;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	if (!btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_WORKQUEUE))
> -		return;
>  	if (htab_has_extra_elems(htab))
>  		num_entries += num_possible_cpus();
>  
> @@ -254,8 +233,12 @@ static void htab_free_prealloced_wq(struct bpf_htab *htab)
>  		struct htab_elem *elem;
>  
>  		elem = get_htab_elem(htab, i);
> -		bpf_obj_free_workqueue(htab->map.record,
> -				       elem->key + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8));
> +		if (btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_TIMER))
> +			bpf_obj_free_timer(htab->map.record,
> +					   elem->key + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8));
> +		else

Sorry, this else above is wrong, it should be a check on BPF_WORKQUEUE
instead.

v3 is n its way (with the proper bpf-next suffix this time).

Cheers,
Benjamin

> +			bpf_obj_free_workqueue(htab->map.record,
> +					       elem->key + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8));
>  		cond_resched();
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -1515,7 +1498,7 @@ static void delete_all_elements(struct bpf_htab *htab)
>  	migrate_enable();
>  }
>  
> -static void htab_free_malloced_timers_or_wq(struct bpf_htab *htab, bool is_timer)
> +static void htab_free_malloced_timers_and_wq(struct bpf_htab *htab)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> @@ -1527,10 +1510,10 @@ static void htab_free_malloced_timers_or_wq(struct bpf_htab *htab, bool is_timer
>  
>  		hlist_nulls_for_each_entry(l, n, head, hash_node) {
>  			/* We only free timer on uref dropping to zero */
> -			if (is_timer)
> +			if (btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_TIMER))
>  				bpf_obj_free_timer(htab->map.record,
>  						   l->key + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8));
> -			else
> +			if (btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_WORKQUEUE))
>  				bpf_obj_free_workqueue(htab->map.record,
>  						       l->key + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8));
>  		}
> @@ -1544,17 +1527,11 @@ static void htab_map_free_timers_and_wq(struct bpf_map *map)
>  	struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
>  
>  	/* We only free timer and workqueue on uref dropping to zero */
> -	if (btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_TIMER)) {
> -		if (!htab_is_prealloc(htab))
> -			htab_free_malloced_timers_or_wq(htab, true);
> -		else
> -			htab_free_prealloced_timers(htab);
> -	}
> -	if (btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_WORKQUEUE)) {
> +	if (btf_record_has_field(htab->map.record, BPF_TIMER | BPF_WORKQUEUE)) {
>  		if (!htab_is_prealloc(htab))
> -			htab_free_malloced_timers_or_wq(htab, false);
> +			htab_free_malloced_timers_and_wq(htab);
>  		else
> -			htab_free_prealloced_wq(htab);
> +			htab_free_prealloced_timers_and_wq(htab);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.44.0
>