linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Remove NULL check before dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240430131603.GF100414@unreal>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:16:03 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Remove NULL check before dev_{put, hold}

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Jules Irenge wrote:
> Coccinelle reports a warning
> 
> WARNING: NULL check before dev_{put, hold} functions is not needed
> 
> The reason is the call netdev_{put, hold} of dev_{put,hold} will check NULL
> There is no need to check before using dev_{put, hold}
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
> index 8dfb57f712b0..f23d7116e6d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
> @@ -68,16 +68,14 @@ static int get_route_and_out_devs(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
>  	 * while holding rcu read lock. Take the net_device for correctness
>  	 * sake.
>  	 */
> -	if (uplink_upper)
> -		dev_hold(uplink_upper);
> +	dev_hold(uplink_upper);

I see same if (..) dev_hold() in drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c too.

>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  	dst_is_lag_dev = (uplink_upper &&
>  			  netif_is_lag_master(uplink_upper) &&
>  			  real_dev == uplink_upper &&
>  			  mlx5_lag_is_sriov(priv->mdev));
> -	if (uplink_upper)
> -		dev_put(uplink_upper);
> +	dev_put(uplink_upper);

This pattern exists in other places in the same file and others too.

Let's change all of them in one patch.

Thanks

>  
>  	/* if the egress device isn't on the same HW e-switch or
>  	 * it's a LAG device, use the uplink
> -- 
> 2.43.2
> 
>