[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DU0PR04MB941755376CA87C2EC70FDF7088192@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 23:25:25 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Thierry
Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dvorkin Dmitry <dvorkin@...bo.com>, Wells Lu <wellslutw@...il.com>, Maxime
Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>, Hal Feng
<hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>, Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, Viresh
Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
"soc@...nel.org" <soc@...nel.org>, Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Geert
Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Patrice Chotard
<patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Damien Le
Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Ludovic Desroches
<ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>, Nicolas Ferre
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, Pengutronix
Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Chester Lin <chester62515@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>, "Ghennadi Procopciuc (OSS)"
<ghennadi.procopciuc@....nxp.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>, Matthias
Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, Joel
Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 08/21] pinctrl: samsung: Use scope based of_node_put()
cleanups
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] pinctrl: samsung: Use scope based of_node_put()
> cleanups
>
> On 01/05/2024 14:56, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > Use scope based of_node_put() cleanup to simplify code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c | 3 +--
> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 16 ++++------------
> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c64xx.c | 8 ++------
> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
> > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c
> > b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c
> > index 85ddf49a5188..9a57b3ceb536 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ s5pv210_retention_init(struct
> samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata,
> > const struct samsung_retention_data *data) {
> > struct samsung_retention_ctrl *ctrl;
> > - struct device_node *np;
> > + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = NULL;
> > void __iomem *clk_base;
> >
> > ctrl = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev, sizeof(*ctrl), GFP_KERNEL); @@
> > -71,7 +71,6 @@ s5pv210_retention_init(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data
> *drvdata,
> > }
> >
> > clk_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > - of_node_put(np);
>
> I don't think the code as simpler. Previous was very easy to read, obvious, no
> error paths.
>
> To me any conversion of such of_node_get immediately followed by
> of_node_put is unwelcomed. Easy code is being converted to complicated
> one.
ok. I will drop the changes to code pieces as you commented.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists