linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 02/17] ACPI: scan: Add a weak function to reorder the IRQCHIP probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240501121742.1215792-3-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Wed,  1 May 2024 17:47:27 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
	Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@...el.com>,
	Haibo1 Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
	Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
	Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/17] ACPI: scan: Add a weak function to reorder the IRQCHIP probe

Unlike OF framework, the irqchip probe using IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE has no
order defined. Depending on the Makefile is not a good idea. So,
usually it is worked around by mandating only root interrupt controller
probed using IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE and other interrupt controllers are
probed via cascade mechanism.

However, this is also not a clean solution because if there are multiple
root controllers (ex: RINTC in RISC-V which is per CPU) which need to be
probed first, then the cascade will happen for every root controller.
So, introduce a architecture specific weak function to order the probing
of the interrupt controllers which can be implemented by different
architectures as per their interrupt controller hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c  | 3 +++
 include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 4804a2ad1578..837b8fc89dfb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -2744,6 +2744,8 @@ static int __init acpi_match_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void __weak arch_sort_irqchip_probe(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr) { }
+
 int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
 {
 	int count = 0;
@@ -2752,6 +2754,7 @@ int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
 		return 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&acpi_probe_mutex);
+	arch_sort_irqchip_probe(ap_head, nr);
 	for (ape = ap_head; nr; ape++, nr--) {
 		if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAMESEG(ACPI_SIG_MADT, ape->id)) {
 			acpi_probe_count = 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index c2ae33b8dbb6..1afa289f1f4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -1339,6 +1339,8 @@ struct acpi_probe_entry {
 	kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
 };
 
+void arch_sort_irqchip_probe(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr);
+
 #define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable,	\
 				 valid, data, fn)			\
 	static const struct acpi_probe_entry __acpi_probe_##name	\
-- 
2.40.1