[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14e1cf11-ce4c-4d83-97da-1bd4e44ae2b0@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 15:22:20 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: zhaimingbing <zhaimingbing@...s.chinamobile.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf lock: More strdup argument freeing
On 30/04/2024 19:41, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Leak sanitizer complains about the strdup-ed arguments not being
> freed. rec_argv is reordered and duplicates inserted, meaning making
> all its contents strdup-ed and freeing them all leads to double frees
> or leaks. Add an extra array to track strup-ed arguments and free
> them. This makes address sanitier running `perf test` "kernel lock
> contention analysis test" memory leak free.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists