linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 5/8] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <621b4545-454f-46d1-8ccb-2d1dc522e8eb@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 18:43:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: mr.nuke.me@...il.com, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam
 <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 5/8] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

On 01/05/2024 17:43, mr.nuke.me@...il.com wrote:
> On 5/1/24 5:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/05/2024 06:28, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>>> IPQ9574 has four PCIe controllers: two single-lane Gen3, and two
>>> dual-lane Gen3. The controllers are identical from a software
>>> perspective, with the differences appearing in the PHYs.
>>>
>>> Add a compatible for the PCIe on IPQ9574.
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
>> provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
>> can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
>> the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
>> version they apply.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
> I had an Acked-by tag from Rob for what is now patch 6/8 -- previously 
> 5/7. Due to last-minute info from QUIC Inc, Dmitry and I decided to move 
> the "snoc" and "anoc" clocks out of the PHY and to the PCIe controller.
> 
> This change resulted in a 6/8 patch that is substantially different from 
> what Rob acked. I felt it was inappropriate to keep the tag.

So please read my message again:
"If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed."

Your changelog for that patch should say that.


Best regards,
Krzysztof