[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240502205345.GK2118490@ZenIV>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 21:53:45 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
elver@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, dianders@...omium.org, pmladek@...e.com,
arnd@...db.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 cmpxchg 12/13] sh: Emulate one-byte cmpxchg
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 06:33:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Understood, and this sort of compatibility consideration is why this
> version of this patchset does not emulate two-byte (16-bit) cmpxchg()
> operations. The original (RFC) series did emulate these, which does
> not work on a few architectures that do not provide 16-bit load/store
> instructions, hence no 16-bit support in this series.
>
> So this one-byte-only series affects only Alpha systems lacking
> single-byte load/store instructions. If I understand correctly, Alpha
> 21164A (EV56) and later *do* have single-byte load/store instructions,
> and thus are still just fine. In fact, it looks like EV56 also has
> two-byte load/store instructions, and so would have been OK with
> the original one-/two-byte RFC series.
Wait a sec. On Alpha we already implement 16bit and 8bit xchg and cmpxchg.
See arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h:
static inline unsigned long
____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned short old, unsigned short new)
{
unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
__asm__ __volatile__(
" andnot %5,7,%4\n"
" inswl %1,%5,%1\n"
"1: ldq_l %2,0(%4)\n"
" extwl %2,%5,%0\n"
" cmpeq %0,%6,%3\n"
" beq %3,2f\n"
" mskwl %2,%5,%2\n"
" or %1,%2,%2\n"
" stq_c %2,0(%4)\n"
" beq %2,3f\n"
"2:\n"
".subsection 2\n"
"3: br 1b\n"
".previous"
: "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
: "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
return prev;
}
Load-locked and store-conditional are done on 64bit value, with
16bit operations done in registers. This is what 16bit store
(assignment to unsigned short *) turns into with
stw $17,0($16) // *(u16*)r16 = r17
and without -mbwx
insql $17,$16,$17 // r17 = r17 << (8 * (r16 & 7))
ldq_u $1,0($16) // r1 = *(u64 *)(r16 & ~7)
mskwl $1,$16,$1 // r1 &= ~(0xffff << (8 * (r16 & 7))
bis $17,$1,$17 // r17 |= r1
stq_u $17,0($16) // *(u64 *)(r16 & ~7) = r17
What's more, load-locked/store-conditional doesn't have 16bit and 8bit
variants on any Alphas - it's always 32bit (ldl_l) or 64bit (ldq_l).
What BWX adds is load/store byte/word, load/store byte/word unaligned
and sign-extend byte/word. IOW, it's absolutely irrelevant for
cmpxchg (or xchg) purposes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists