linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/110] 6.1.90-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 08:41:05 +0200
From: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/110] 6.1.90-rc1 review

[2024-04-30 12:39] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.90 release.
> There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi, 6.1.90-rc1 is running fine on a TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (the SoC is a 
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9563, which has a 74Kc MIPS core).

Note that I have *not* tested building the kernel documentation, and I 
suspect that building the documentation with docutils >= 0.21 would 
likely fail without the patch from

https://lore.kernel.org/all/faf5fa45-2a9d-4573-9d2e-3930bdc1ed65@gmail.com/

Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>

Regards
Pascal