[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c565faef-bf23-4704-a3e4-b95abd964e35@hardfalcon.net>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 08:41:05 +0200
From: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/110] 6.1.90-rc1 review
[2024-04-30 12:39] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.90 release.
> There are 110 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi, 6.1.90-rc1 is running fine on a TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (the SoC is a
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9563, which has a 74Kc MIPS core).
Note that I have *not* tested building the kernel documentation, and I
suspect that building the documentation with docutils >= 0.21 would
likely fail without the patch from
https://lore.kernel.org/all/faf5fa45-2a9d-4573-9d2e-3930bdc1ed65@gmail.com/
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists