[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240502093735.GK5338@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 10:37:35 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Walklin <ryan@...ttoast.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] regulator: Fix AXP717 PMIC support
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024, Ryan Walklin wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, at 12:07 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > This is v2 of the fixes to the AXP717 PMIC support series.
> <snip>
> > I don't know if that's still feasible, but those two patches would be a
> > good candidate to squash into the patches that they fix.
> >
> > The other three patches add the "boost" regulator, which is meant to
> > provide the 5V USB VBUS power when operating from the battery. It's the
> > usual trinity of binding/mfd/regulator patches.
> > Again this could be squashed into the respective patches from the
> > original series, if people agree.
> >
> > Please have a look and test!
> >
> > Based on mfd/ib-mfd-regulator-6.10, as detailed below.
>
> Looks good here, RSB communication, regulator and 5v boost support configured via DT working well on my H700 board, established by a combination of successful device bringup and kernel reporting. Concur with the request to be squashed into the mfd-next tree for 6.10 if possible, thanks!
>
> Ryan
>
> Tested-by: Ryan Walklin <ryan@...ttoast,com>
This doesn't look like a valid email address.
Did you manually type it out? I suggest against doing that.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists