linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to pci-acpi.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 15:26:26 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
	Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@...el.com>,
	Haibo1 Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
	Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to
 pci-acpi.c

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:22:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 05:47:26PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > The functions defined in arm64 for ACPI support are required
> > for RISC-V also. To avoid duplication, move these functions
> > to common location.
> 
> ...
> 
> There are -M -C parameters to git format-patch. Use them in the next version of
> the series. (Note, you may add percentage numbers to each of those parameters
> to get prettier result.)
> 
Yeah, I tried different combination of percentage after you told me last
time. I just didn't see any difference in the patch generated. Let me
try again while sending next version. Thanks!