[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240502110501.772941f7fdbc1650a9a3bea4@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 11:05:01 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, clm@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend ftrace] Asynchronous grace period for
register_ftrace_direct()
On Wed, 1 May 2024 16:12:37 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> Note that the immediate pressure for this patch should be relieved by the
> NAPI patch series [1], but this sort of problem could easily arise again.
>
> When running heavy test workloads with KASAN enabled, RCU Tasks grace
> periods can extend for many tens of seconds, significantly slowing
> trace registration. Therefore, make the registration-side RCU Tasks
> grace period be asynchronous via call_rcu_tasks().
>
Good catch! AFAICS, there is no reason to wait for synchronization
when adding a new direct trampoline.
This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you,
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1710877680.git.yan@cloudflare.com/
>
> Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> Cc: <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 6c96b30f3d63b..32ea92934268c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -5365,6 +5365,13 @@ static void remove_direct_functions_hash(struct ftrace_hash *hash, unsigned long
> }
> }
>
> +static void register_ftrace_direct_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> +{
> + struct ftrace_hash *fhp = container_of(rhp, struct ftrace_hash, rcu);
> +
> + free_ftrace_hash(fhp);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * register_ftrace_direct - Call a custom trampoline directly
> * for multiple functions registered in @ops
> @@ -5463,10 +5470,8 @@ int register_ftrace_direct(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long addr)
> out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&direct_mutex);
>
> - if (free_hash && free_hash != EMPTY_HASH) {
> - synchronize_rcu_tasks();
> - free_ftrace_hash(free_hash);
> - }
> + if (free_hash && free_hash != EMPTY_HASH)
> + call_rcu_tasks(&free_hash->rcu, register_ftrace_direct_cb);
>
> if (new_hash)
> free_ftrace_hash(new_hash);
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists