[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2287494109b15960db7de6217ebcf4612a8daac2.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 11:44:37 +0100
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Peter Griffin
<peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, Sam Protsenko
<semen.protsenko@...aro.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: specify empty clocks
for remaining pinctrl
On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 07:51 +0100, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
> All 4 patches could have been squashed in a single patch as they do the
> same thing, but I'm fine either way:
>
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
I guess the patches had accumulated gradually over a period of time while
more CMU support was being implemented.
I'm happy to squash them if that's the preference? Krzysztof?
Cheers,
Andre'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists