linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fine-tuning and 'no stable backport' tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87jzkc6vl7.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 10:13:08 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fine-tuning and 'no
 stable backport' tag

Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> writes:

> After a recent discussion regarding "do we need a 'nobackport' tag" I
> set out to create one change for stable-kernel-rules.rst. This is now
> the last patch in the series, which links to that discussion with
> all the details; the other stuff is fine-tuning that happened along the
> way.

I've applied the set, thanks.

jon