[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <26784ee39fbb3fbd0fe96508158d74419018e6ad.1714762038.git.namcao@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 21:23:22 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@...el.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: hotplug: remove TODO notes for sgi_hotplug
Commit c7532b601e77 ("PCI/hotplug: remove the sgi_hotplug driver")
deleted the driver.
Remove the remaining TODO notes as well.
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO b/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO
index f0a1746c3c88..9d428b0ea524 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/TODO
@@ -49,14 +49,6 @@ ibmphp:
* Returned code from pci_hp_add_bridge() is not checked.
-sgi_hotplug:
-
-* Several functions access the pci_slot member in struct hotplug_slot even
- though pci_hotplug.h declares it private. See sn_hp_destroy() for an
- example. Either the pci_slot member should no longer be declared private
- or sgi_hotplug should store a pointer to it in struct slot. Probably the
- former.
-
shpchp:
* There is only a single implementation of struct hpc_ops. Can the struct be
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists