[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240503143327.RFT.v2.9.Iaddb8e0cab570e2f8066a4baf1d49239a820b799@changeid>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:32:50 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFT PATCH v2 09/48] drm/panel: innolux-p079zca: Don't call unprepare+disable at shutdown/remove
It's the responsibility of a correctly written DRM modeset driver to
call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at shutdown time and that should be
disabling / unpreparing the panel if needed. Panel drivers shouldn't
be calling these functions themselves.
A recent effort was made to fix as many DRM modeset drivers as
possible [1] [2] [3] and most drivers are fixed now.
A grep through mainline for compatible strings used by this driver
indicates that it is used by Rockchip boards. The Rockchip driver
appears to be correctly calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() so we can
remove the calls.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234015.566018-1-dianders@chromium.org
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234202.566951-1-dianders@chromium.org
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921192749.1542462-1-dianders@chromium.org
Cc: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@...ech.de>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Only handle 1 panel per patch.
- Split removal of prepared/enabled from handling of remove/shutdown.
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c
index 5833d3a0fc79..280f0fc35b67 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c
@@ -471,13 +471,6 @@ static void innolux_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
struct innolux_panel *innolux = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
int err;
- err = drm_panel_unprepare(&innolux->base);
- if (err < 0)
- dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to unprepare panel: %d\n", err);
-
- err = drm_panel_disable(&innolux->base);
- if (err < 0)
- dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to disable panel: %d\n", err);
err = mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
if (err < 0)
@@ -486,14 +479,6 @@ static void innolux_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
innolux_panel_del(innolux);
}
-static void innolux_panel_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
-{
- struct innolux_panel *innolux = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
-
- drm_panel_unprepare(&innolux->base);
- drm_panel_disable(&innolux->base);
-}
-
static struct mipi_dsi_driver innolux_panel_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "panel-innolux-p079zca",
@@ -501,7 +486,6 @@ static struct mipi_dsi_driver innolux_panel_driver = {
},
.probe = innolux_panel_probe,
.remove = innolux_panel_remove,
- .shutdown = innolux_panel_shutdown,
};
module_mipi_dsi_driver(innolux_panel_driver);
--
2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists