linux-kernel - [RFT PATCH v2 33/48] drm/panel: jdi-lt070me05000: Don't call disable at shutdown/remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240503143327.RFT.v2.33.I5f3426e511e77b93c247e0aac114bd12b2b2a933@changeid>
Date: Fri,  3 May 2024 14:33:14 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
	Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@...il.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFT PATCH v2 33/48] drm/panel: jdi-lt070me05000: Don't call disable at shutdown/remove

It's the responsibility of a correctly written DRM modeset driver to
call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() at shutdown time and that should be
disabling / unpreparing the panel if needed. Panel drivers shouldn't
be calling these functions themselves.

A recent effort was made to fix as many DRM modeset drivers as
possible [1] [2] [3] and most drivers are fixed now.

A grep through mainline for compatible strings used by this driver
indicates that it is used by Qualcomm boards. The Qualcomm driver
appears to be correctly calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() so we can
remove the calls.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234015.566018-1-dianders@chromium.org
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901234202.566951-1-dianders@chromium.org
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921192749.1542462-1-dianders@chromium.org

Cc: Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@...il.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
- Only handle 1 panel per patch.
- Split removal of prepared/enabled from handling of remove/shutdown.

 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c
index 4ddddee6fa1e..b1ce186de261 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c
@@ -452,10 +452,6 @@ static void jdi_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 	struct jdi_panel *jdi = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = drm_panel_disable(&jdi->base);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to disable panel: %d\n", ret);
-
 	ret = mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to detach from DSI host: %d\n",
@@ -464,13 +460,6 @@ static void jdi_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 	jdi_panel_del(jdi);
 }
 
-static void jdi_panel_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
-{
-	struct jdi_panel *jdi = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
-
-	drm_panel_disable(&jdi->base);
-}
-
 static struct mipi_dsi_driver jdi_panel_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "panel-jdi-lt070me05000",
@@ -478,7 +467,6 @@ static struct mipi_dsi_driver jdi_panel_driver = {
 	},
 	.probe = jdi_panel_probe,
 	.remove = jdi_panel_remove,
-	.shutdown = jdi_panel_shutdown,
 };
 module_mipi_dsi_driver(jdi_panel_driver);
 
-- 
2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog