[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8d0a893-25ec-4119-abb5-c65adda51b49@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 16:33:00 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] x86/syscall: Mark exit[_group] syscall handlers
__noreturn
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:44:17PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:57:00PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:48:13PM -0700, Paul McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 2:47 PM Paul McKenney <paulmckrcu@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And this definitely helped, thank you!
> > > >
> > > > However, this one still remains:
> > > >
> > > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: ia32_sys_call+0x29b6:
> > > > __ia32_sys_exit_group() is missing a __noreturn annotation
> > >
> > > And looking at the patched code, this function looks to me to be
> > > correctly marked.
> > >
> > > No idea... :-/
> >
> > Ah, I think I missed fixing syscall_32.tbl. Lemme see how to do that...
>
> Can you try adding this on top?
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> index 5f8591ce7f25..f30b608d14dc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> # The abi is always "i386" for this file.
> #
> 0 i386 restart_syscall sys_restart_syscall
> -1 i386 exit sys_exit
> +1 i386 exit sys_exit 0 noreturn
> 2 i386 fork sys_fork
> 3 i386 read sys_read
> 4 i386 write sys_write
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
> 249 i386 io_cancel sys_io_cancel
> 250 i386 fadvise64 sys_ia32_fadvise64
> # 251 is available for reuse (was briefly sys_set_zone_reclaim)
> -252 i386 exit_group sys_exit_group
> +252 i386 exit_group sys_exit_group 0 noreturn
> 253 i386 lookup_dcookie
> 254 i386 epoll_create sys_epoll_create
> 255 i386 epoll_ctl sys_epoll_ctl
Thank you!
But for non-KCSAN builds, I get the following diagnostics:
In file included from arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c:17:
/arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h:2:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before numeric constant
2 | __SYSCALL_NORETURN(1, sys_exit)
For KCSAN builds, I instead get the following diagnostics:
In file included from arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c:17:
/arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h:2:20: error: expected parameter declarator
__SYSCALL_NORETURN(1, sys_exit)
Does arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c need the following additional patch?
A quick smoke test passes, but perhaps I am just getting lucky...
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
index aab31760b4e3e..d9ae910ea6f33 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
@@ -14,9 +14,13 @@
#endif
#define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) extern long __ia32_##sym(const struct pt_regs *);
+#define __SYSCALL_NORETURN(nr, sym) extern long __noreturn __ia32_##sym(const struct pt_regs *);
#include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
#undef __SYSCALL
+#undef __SYSCALL_NORETURN
+#define __SYSCALL_NORETURN __SYSCALL
+
#define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) __ia32_##sym,
const sys_call_ptr_t ia32_sys_call_table[] = {
#include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists