[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240503035105.93280-4-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 20:51:04 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] selftests/cgroup: cpu_hogger init: use {} instead of {NULL}
First of all, in order to build with clang at all, one must first apply
Valentin Obst's build fix for LLVM [1]. Once that is done, then when
building with clang, via:
make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftests
..clang generates warning here, because struct cpu_hogger has multiple
fields, and the code is initializing an array of these structs, and it
is incorrect to specify a single NULL value as the initializer.
Fix this by initializing with {}, so that the compiler knows to use
default initializer values for all fields in each array entry.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240329-selftests-libmk-llvm-rfc-v1-1-2f9ed7d1c49f@valentinobst.de/
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c
index 24020a2c68dc..e4266b60e5ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpu.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ run_cpucg_weight_test(
{
int ret = KSFT_FAIL, i;
char *parent = NULL;
- struct cpu_hogger children[3] = {NULL};
+ struct cpu_hogger children[3] = {};
parent = cg_name(root, "cpucg_test_0");
if (!parent)
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ run_cpucg_nested_weight_test(const char *root, bool overprovisioned)
{
int ret = KSFT_FAIL, i;
char *parent = NULL, *child = NULL;
- struct cpu_hogger leaf[3] = {NULL};
+ struct cpu_hogger leaf[3] = {};
long nested_leaf_usage, child_usage;
int nprocs = get_nprocs();
--
2.45.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists