[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240503072029.GE1227636@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 08:20:29 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: André Apitzsch <git@...tzsch.eu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] leds: sy7802: Add support for Silergy SY7802
flash LED controller
On Thu, 02 May 2024, André Apitzsch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 02.05.2024 um 10:10 +0100 schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Wed, 01 May 2024, André Apitzsch wrote:
> >
> > > > > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > > > > + goto unlock;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (level)
> > > > > + curr = chip->fled_torch_used | BIT(led-
> > > > > >led_no);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + curr = chip->fled_torch_used & ~BIT(led-
> > > > > >led_no);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (curr)
> > > > > + val |= SY7802_MODE_TORCH;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Torch needs to be disabled first to apply new
> > > > > brightness */
> > > >
> > > > "Disable touch to apply brightness"
> > > >
> > > > > + ret = regmap_update_bits(chip->regmap,
> > > > > SY7802_REG_ENABLE,
> > > > > SY7802_MODE_MASK,
> > > > > + SY7802_MODE_OFF);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + goto unlock;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mask = led->led_no == SY7802_LED_JOINT ?
> > > > > SY7802_TORCH_CURRENT_MASK_ALL :
> > > >
> > > > Why not just use led->led_no in place of mask?
> > >
> > > I might be missing something, but I don't know how to use led-
> > > >led_no
> > > in place of mask, when
> > > led->led_no is in {0,1,2} and
> > > mask is in {0x07, 0x38, 0x3f}.
> >
> > This doesn't make much sense.
> >
> > I guess you mean that led_no is a u8 and mask is a u32.
> >
> > What happens if you cast led_no to u32 in the call to
> > regmap_update_bits()?
>
> Sorry, I'm still confused. Could you elaborate your original question?
Replied where there is still context.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists