lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE8VWi+-HVuGo-ojGPwKubpLweBmJ4-L097nh03QkezcsciorA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:31:22 +0530
From: Shresth Prasad <shresthprasad7@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	davem@...emloft.net, jirislaby@...nel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
	javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][next] tty: sunsu: Simplify device_node cleanup by
 using __free

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:04 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 10:21:16PM +0530, Shresth Prasad wrote:
> > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 9:35 PM Ilpo Järvinen
> > <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 1 May 2024, Shresth Prasad wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add `__free` function attribute to `ap` and `match` pointer
> > > > initialisations which ensure that the pointers are freed as soon as they
> > > > go out of scope, thus removing the need to manually free them using
> > > > `of_node_put`.
> > > >
> > > > This also removes the need for the `goto` statement and the `rc`
> > > > variable.
> > > >
> > > > Tested using a qemu x86_64 virtual machine.
> > >
> > > Eh, how can you test this with an x86_64 VM ???
> > >
> > > config SERIAL_SUNSU
> > >         tristate "Sun SU serial support"
> > >         depends on SPARC && PCI
> > >
> >
> > By that, I mean that I compiled the kernel and ran the produced bzImage
> > on a x86_64 qemu machine.
>
> But you didn't include the driver you were testing :(
>
> > I unfortunately don't have the hardware to test it on, but I don't
> > think the change is complex enough to require testing on real hardware
> > (unless I'm assuming incorrectly).
>
> That's why I asked if you had tested this or not...
>

Really sorry about that, I thought compiling and booting would qualify
as testing. What should I be doing then?

Regards,
Shresth

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ