| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 10:31:11 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, chrisl@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
hanchuanhua@...o.com, hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com,
kasong@...cent.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, surenb@...gle.com,
v-songbaohua@...o.com, willy@...radead.org, xiang@...nel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: remove swap_free() and always use
swap_free_nr()
On 03/05/2024 01:50, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
>
> To streamline maintenance efforts, we propose discontinuing the use of
> swap_free(). Instead, we can simply invoke swap_free_nr() with nr set
> to 1. This adjustment offers the advantage of enabling batch processing
> within kernel/power/swap.c. Furthermore, swap_free_nr() is designed with
> a bitmap consisting of only one long, resulting in overhead that can be
> ignored for cases where nr equals 1.
>
> Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/swap.h | 5 -----
> kernel/power/swap.c | 7 +++----
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> mm/rmap.c | 4 ++--
> mm/shmem.c | 4 ++--
> mm/swapfile.c | 19 +++++--------------
> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index d1d35e92d7e9..f03cb446124e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -482,7 +482,6 @@ extern int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t, gfp_t);
> extern void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t);
> extern int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t);
> extern int swapcache_prepare(swp_entry_t);
> -extern void swap_free(swp_entry_t);
I wonder if it would be cleaner to:
#define swap_free(entry) swap_free_nr((entry), 1)
To save all the churn for the callsites that just want to pass a single entry?
> extern void swap_free_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr_pages);
> extern void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n);
> extern void free_swap_and_cache_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr);
> @@ -561,10 +560,6 @@ static inline int swapcache_prepare(swp_entry_t swp)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void swap_free(swp_entry_t swp)
> -{
> -}
> -
> static inline void swap_free_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr_pages)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/power/swap.c b/kernel/power/swap.c
> index 5bc04bfe2db1..6befaa88a342 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/swap.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/swap.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ sector_t alloc_swapdev_block(int swap)
> offset = swp_offset(get_swap_page_of_type(swap));
> if (offset) {
> if (swsusp_extents_insert(offset))
> - swap_free(swp_entry(swap, offset));
> + swap_free_nr(swp_entry(swap, offset), 1);
> else
> return swapdev_block(swap, offset);
> }
> @@ -200,12 +200,11 @@ void free_all_swap_pages(int swap)
>
> while ((node = swsusp_extents.rb_node)) {
> struct swsusp_extent *ext;
> - unsigned long offset;
>
> ext = rb_entry(node, struct swsusp_extent, node);
> rb_erase(node, &swsusp_extents);
> - for (offset = ext->start; offset <= ext->end; offset++)
> - swap_free(swp_entry(swap, offset));
> + swap_free_nr(swp_entry(swap, ext->start),
> + ext->end - ext->start + 1);
>
> kfree(ext);
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index eea6e4984eae..f033eb3528ba 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4225,7 +4225,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> * We're already holding a reference on the page but haven't mapped it
> * yet.
> */
> - swap_free(entry);
> + swap_free_nr(entry, 1);
> if (should_try_to_free_swap(folio, vma, vmf->flags))
> folio_free_swap(folio);
>
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 087a79f1f611..39ec7742acec 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> goto walk_done_err;
> }
> if (arch_unmap_one(mm, vma, address, pteval) < 0) {
> - swap_free(entry);
> + swap_free_nr(entry, 1);
> set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
> goto walk_done_err;
> }
> @@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> /* See folio_try_share_anon_rmap(): clear PTE first. */
> if (anon_exclusive &&
> folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte(folio, subpage)) {
> - swap_free(entry);
> + swap_free_nr(entry, 1);
> set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
> goto walk_done_err;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index fa2a0ed97507..bfc8a2beb24f 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> * in shmem_evict_inode().
> */
> shmem_recalc_inode(inode, -1, -1);
> - swap_free(swap);
> + swap_free_nr(swap, 1);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>
> delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> - swap_free(swap);
> + swap_free_nr(swap, 1);
> put_swap_device(si);
>
> *foliop = folio;
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index ec12f2b9d229..ddcd0f24b9a1 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1343,19 +1343,6 @@ static void swap_entry_free(struct swap_info_struct *p, swp_entry_t entry)
> swap_range_free(p, offset, 1);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Caller has made sure that the swap device corresponding to entry
> - * is still around or has not been recycled.
> - */
> -void swap_free(swp_entry_t entry)
> -{
> - struct swap_info_struct *p;
> -
> - p = _swap_info_get(entry);
> - if (p)
> - __swap_entry_free(p, entry);
> -}
> -
> static void cluster_swap_free_nr(struct swap_info_struct *sis,
> unsigned long offset, int nr_pages)
> {
> @@ -1385,6 +1372,10 @@ static void cluster_swap_free_nr(struct swap_info_struct *sis,
> unlock_cluster_or_swap_info(sis, ci);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Caller has made sure that the swap device corresponding to entry
> + * is still around or has not been recycled.
> + */
> void swap_free_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr_pages)
> {
> int nr;
> @@ -1930,7 +1921,7 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> new_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(new_pte);
> setpte:
> set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, new_pte);
> - swap_free(entry);
> + swap_free_nr(entry, 1);
> out:
> if (pte)
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists