linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/52] USB: store owner from modules with usb_serial_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 11:48:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/52] USB: store owner from modules with
 usb_serial_register_drivers()

On 03/05/2024 11:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/03/2024 23:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Merging
>> =======
>> All further patches depend on the first patch.
>>
>> Description
>> ===========
>> This is going to be a bit of a patch-bomb, but with trivial patches, so
>> I think it is still acceptable. If it is too much, apologies and I will
>> solve it.
>>
>> Modules registering driver with usb_serial_register_drivers() might
>> forget to set .owner field.
>>
>> Solve the problem by moving this task away from the drivers to the core
>> amba bus code, just like we did for platform_driver in commit
>> 9447057eaff8 ("platform_device: use a macro instead of
>> platform_driver_register").
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Any comments on this patchset? I know your patchqueue is usually busy,
> that's why I did not ping for some time. I just want to know it did not
> end up in some spam folder.

Never mind, I missed Johan's response.

Best regards,
Krzysztof