linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add Sophgo SG2042 external hardware monitor support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <IA1PR20MB49535CF3617665EC8370F2E0BB1F2@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 20:13:01 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, 
	Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, 
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add Sophgo SG2042 external
 hardware monitor support

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 09:09:30AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/05/2024 04:20, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > Due to the design, Sophgo SG2042 use an external MCU to provide
> > hardware information, thermal information and reset control.
> > 
> > Add bindings for this monitor device.
> 
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +  - "#thermal-sensor-cells"
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: ../thermal/thermal-sensor.yaml#
> 
> Where did you find such path? Please use full path instead, so
> /schemas/thermal.....

Thanks. I will change it.

> 
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> 
> unevaluatedProperties: false instead (even though currently it does not
> matter).
> 

Thanks, I have checked json schema doc, using "unevaluatedProperties"
is more suitable.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>