linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Support uncore NI-700 Performance Monitor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240503131148.GC18392@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:11:49 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: "JiaLong.Yang" <jialong.yang@...ngroup.cn>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, shenghui.qu@...ngroup.cn,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Support uncore NI-700 Performance Monitor

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:16:00PM +0800, JiaLong.Yang wrote:
> 1. 
> The MAINTAINERS file should be in dt-bindings or drivers?
> It's needed by the two subpatchs.
> I place it in dt-bindings. So I receive the warning in driver patch.
> 
> 2.
> When using the new macro DEFINE_FREE(), we should ended it without ';'.
> So there is one warning asking me to indentation next statement.
> 
> 3.
> If the file vendor-prefixes.yaml should be submit solely?
> 
> JiaLong.Yang (3):
>   dt-bindings: Add HEXIN Technologies Co., Ltd. vendor prefix
>   dt-bindings: perf: Support uncore NI-700 PMU
>   perf/hx_arm_ni: Support uncore NI-700 PMU

Please can you take a look at Robin's series for this IP?

https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1713972897.git.robin.murphy@arm.com

Thanks,

Will