linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] lib: make test_bitops compilable into the kernel image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZjUC2RWfUH3ZVesW@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 23:29:29 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] lib: make test_bitops compilable into the kernel
 image

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 08:13:05AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:24:23AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:14:10PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:00:07AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:32:01PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > > > The test is limited to be compiled as a module. There's no technical
> > > > > reason for it. Now that the test bears performance benchmark, it would
> > > > > be reasonable to allow running it at kernel load time, before userspace
> > > > > starts, to reduce possible jitter.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 -
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > > > > index c63a5fbf1f1c..fc8fe1ea5b49 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > > > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > > > > @@ -2436,7 +2436,6 @@ config TEST_LKM
> > > > >  
> > > > >  config TEST_BITOPS
> > > > >  	tristate "Test module for compilation of bitops operations"
> > > > > -	depends on m
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps it would be better to modify the description in the following
> > > > help section at the same time?
> > > 
> > > What exactly you want to change?
> > >
> > It seems to me that the entire description is written specifically for
> > the module. For instance, "doesn't run or load unless explicitly
> > requested by name. for example: modprobe test_bitops." In my view, this
> > description is no longer accurate.
> 
> In-kernel module is still module. Everything is the same as for .ko,
> except that it's loaded automatically and earlier for you. To me this
> part of the description is correct.
> 
> If you feel it should be reworded - feel free to submit a patch. Now
> that we add more functionality in that, it's probably worth to do. Not
> in this series, though.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yury

Got it, thank you for the explanation! :)

Regards,
Kuan-Wei