linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Sophgo CV1800 USB phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240503-deduct-jellied-23f4f90e94e3@spud>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 18:01:45 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
	Liu Gui <kenneth.liu@...hgo.com>,
	Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>, dlan@...too.org,
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Sophgo CV1800 USB phy

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 08:36:47AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 06:05:28PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 08:28:47AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 06:09:20PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:31:11AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:

> > > > > +  vbus_det-gpios:
> > > > 
> > > > "vbus_det-gpios" isn't a common property AFAICT, why does it not get a
> > > > vendor prefix when the other gpios property does?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I have seen other binding (such as sunxi phy) uses this property without 
> > > vendor prefix. So I think it is a common property and don't add perfix 
> > > for it. But it is OK for me add the vendor prefix, thanks.
> > 
> > I asked yesterday and Krzysztof said:
> > "gpios just like supplies - no prefixes, I think."
> 
> Thanks for your explanation. If I do not understand wrong, you mean 
> it does not need to add vender prefix?

Yeah, I think you're okay.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)