| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID:
<DU0PR04MB94177B9F0B13FF0A0992A7B6881F2@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 00:15:47 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX95 basic dtsi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX95 basic dtsi
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> thanks for your patch.
>
> Am Sonntag, 28. April 2024, 14:22:20 CEST schrieb Peng Fan (OSS):
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > i.MX95 features 6 A55 Cores, ARM Mali GPU, ISP, ML acceleration NPU,
> > and Edgelock secure enclave security. This patch is to add a minimal
> > dtsi, with cpu cores, coresight, scmi, gic, uart, mu, sdhc, lpi2c added.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-clock.h | 187 +++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-power.h | 55 ++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi | 1152
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 1394 insertions(+)
> >
> > [snip]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f52023ec7f0c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
> > [snip]
> > + soc {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
> > +
> > + aips2: bus@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x42000000 0x0 0x800000>;
> > + ranges = <0x42000000 0x0 0x42000000
> 0x8000000>,
> > + <0x28000000 0x0 0x28000000
> 0x10000000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + mu7: mailbox@...30000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x42430000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 234
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + mu8: mailbox@...30000 {
>
> Please sort all nodes by address.
Sure. fix in v4.
>
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x42730000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 235
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + wdog3: watchdog@...90000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx93-wdt";
> > + reg = <0x42490000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + timeout-sec = <40>;
> > + fsl,ext-reset-output;
>
> Isn't this board specific?
Yeah. Board specific, remove it.
>
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + tpm3: pwm@...e0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm";
> > + reg = <0x424e0000 0x1000>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > [snip]
> > + };
> > +
> > + aips3: bus@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus";
> > + reg = <0 0x42800000 0 0x800000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges = <0x42800000 0x0 0x42800000 0x800000>;
> > +
> > + usdhc1: mmc@...50000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-usdhc",
> "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
> > + reg = <0x42850000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_WAKEUPAXI>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_USDHC1>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per";
> > + assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_USDHC1>;
> > + assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_SYSPLL1_PFD1>;
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <400000000>;
> > + bus-width = <8>;
> > + fsl,tuning-start-tap = <1>;
> > + fsl,tuning-step= <2>;
>
> Isn't this board specific? Or is there a hardware limitation?
Yeah, just follow what imx93 has, board could override them.
No hardware limitation as I know.
>
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + usdhc2: mmc@...60000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-usdhc",
> "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
> > + reg = <0x42860000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 87
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_WAKEUPAXI>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_USDHC2>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per";
> > + assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_USDHC2>;
> > + assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_SYSPLL1_PFD1>;
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>;
>
> Why is usdhc2 only 200 MHz but usdhc1 400 MHz?
No specific reason, 400M should also work.
>
> > + bus-width = <4>;
> > + fsl,tuning-start-tap = <1>;
> > + fsl,tuning-step= <2>;
>
> Isn't this board specific? Or is there a hardware limitation?
Yes, just follow what i.MX93 has and board could override them.
>
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + usdhc3: mmc@...b0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-usdhc",
> "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
> > + reg = <0x428b0000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 191
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk
> IMX95_CLK_WAKEUPAXI>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_USDHC3>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per";
>
> No need to configure IMX95_CLK_USDHC3?
I will add it.
>
> > + bus-width = <4>;
> > + fsl,tuning-start-tap = <1>;
> > + fsl,tuning-step= <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio2: gpio@...10000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x43810000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + clock-names = "gpio", "port";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio3: gpio@...20000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x43820000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 51 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + clock-names = "gpio", "port";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio4: gpio@...40000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x43840000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 54 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + clock-names = "gpio", "port";
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio5: gpio@...50000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x43850000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 55 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>;
> > + clock-names = "gpio", "port";
> > + };
> > +
> > + aips1: bus@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x44000000 0x0 0x800000>;
> > + ranges = <0x44000000 0x0 0x44000000 0x800000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + mu1: mailbox@...20000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x44220000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 224
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + mu2: mailbox@...b0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x445b0000 0x1000>;
> > + ranges;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 226
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + sram0: sram@...b1000 {
> > + compatible = "mmio-sram";
> > + reg = <0x445b1000 0x400>;
> > + ranges = <0x0 0x445b1000 0x400>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + scmi_buf0: scmi-sram-section@0 {
> > + compatible = "arm,scmi-
> shmem";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x80>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + scmi_buf1: scmi-sram-section@80
> {
> > + compatible = "arm,scmi-
> shmem";
> > + reg = <0x80 0x80>;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> I guess this MU depends on the system manager firmware, no?
Yes, depends on firmware.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + mu3: mailbox@...d0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x445d0000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 228
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + mu4: mailbox@...f0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x445f0000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 230
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + mu6: mailbox@...30000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> > + reg = <0x44630000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 206
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + tpm1: pwm@...10000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm";
> > + reg = <0x44310000 0x1000>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + tpm2: pwm@...20000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm";
> > + reg = <0x44320000 0x1000>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_TPM2>;
> > + #pwm-cells = <3>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + lpi2c1: i2c@...40000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp-
> lpi2c";
> > + reg = <0x44340000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPI2C1>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + clock-names = "per", "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + lpi2c2: i2c@...50000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp-
> lpi2c";
> > + reg = <0x44350000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPI2C2>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + clock-names = "per", "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + lpspi1: spi@...60000 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-spi", "fsl,imx7ulp-
> spi";
> > + reg = <0x44360000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPSPI1>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + clock-names = "per", "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + lpspi2: spi@...70000 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-spi", "fsl,imx7ulp-
> spi";
> > + reg = <0x44370000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPSPI2>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>;
> > + clock-names = "per", "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + lpuart1: serial@...80000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpuart",
> "fsl,imx8ulp-lpuart",
> > + "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart";
> > + reg = <0x44380000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 19
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPUART1>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + lpuart2: serial@...90000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpuart",
> "fsl,imx8ulp-lpuart",
> > + "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart";
> > + reg = <0x44390000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 20
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPUART2>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + adc1: adc@...30000 {
> > + compatible = "nxp,imx93-adc";
> > + reg = <0x44530000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 199
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 200
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 201
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_ADC>;
> > + clock-names = "ipg";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
>
> Please sort the nodes by address.
Sure.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + aips4: bus@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x49000000 0x0 0x800000>;
> > + ranges = <0x49000000 0x0 0x49000000 0x800000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + smmu: iommu@...d0000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,smmu-v3";
> > + reg = <0x490d0000 0x100000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 325
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 328
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 334
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 326
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + interrupt-names = "eventq", "gerror", "priq",
> "cmdq-sync";
> > + #iommu-cells = <1>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpio1: gpio@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47400000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_M33>,
> > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_M33>;
> > + clock-names = "gpio", "port";
> > + status = "disabled";
>
> I'm wondering of there should be a comment here that gpio1 usually is under
> exclusive control of SM.
Ok, will add comment.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + elemu0: mailbox@...20000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47520000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + elemu1: mailbox@...30000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47530000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + elemu2: mailbox@...40000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47540000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + elemu3: mailbox@...50000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47550000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + elemu4: mailbox@...60000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47560000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + elemu5: mailbox@...70000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47570000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + v2x_mu: mailbox@...50000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-v2x";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47350000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 255 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + v2x_mu6: mailbox@...20000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-v2x";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x47320000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 254 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> > + };
>
> Please sort nodes by address.
Yeah. Fix in v4.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> > + };
> > +};
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
> Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
> Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
> http://www.t/
> q-
> group.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C50f2e03eeb9d4
> b5ec44008dc6822023c%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C
> 0%7C638499742474895703%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4
> wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> 7C%7C&sdata=QQTX4gXs3a%2FXizeqgzpaq3n0vmoQRUYkSufNKVu7LE8%3D
> &reserved=0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists