[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13a313c7-c214-4d49-9029-c79b503c17dd@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:03:15 -0400
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: feliu@...dia.com
Cc: parav@...dia.com, jiri@...dia.com, mst@...hat.com, yishaih@...dia.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Francis Ginther <francis.ginther@...onical.com>,
John Cabaj <john.cabaj@...onical.com>,
Catherine Redfield <catherine.redfield@...onical.com>,
Ankush Pathak <ankush.pathak@...onical.com>,
Chlo Smith <chloe.smith@...onical.com>
Subject: [REGRESSION][v6.8-rc1] virtio-pci: Introduce admin virtqueue
Hi Feng,
During testing, a kernel bug was identified with the suspend/resume
functionality on instances running in a public cloud [0]. This bug is a
regression introduced in v6.8-rc1. After a kernel bisect, the following
commit was identified as the cause of the regression:
fd27ef6b44be ("virtio-pci: Introduce admin virtqueue")
I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue?
This commit is depended upon by other virtio commits, so a revert test
is not really straight forward without reverting all the dependencies.
Any ideas you have would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Joe
http://pad.lv/2063315
Powered by blists - more mailing lists