[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <330c909a-4b96-4960-9cad-fd10e86c67b8@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:17:26 +1200
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
<seanjc@...gle.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>, "Yamahata, Isaku"
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/virt/tdx: Export global metadata read
infrastructure
On 3/05/2024 12:21 pm, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-03-02 at 00:20 +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
>> KVM will need to read a bunch of non-TDMR related metadata to create and
>> run TDX guests. Export the metadata read infrastructure for KVM to use.
>>
>> Specifically, export two helpers:
>>
>> 1) The helper which reads multiple metadata fields to a buffer of a
>> structure based on the "field ID -> structure member" mapping table.
>>
>> 2) The low level helper which just reads a given field ID.
>>
> Could 2 be a static inline in a helper, and then only have one export?
I assume you were thinking about making 2) call the 1), so we don't need
to export 2).
This is not feasible due to:
a). 1) must 'struct tdx_metadata_field_mapping' table as input, and for
that we need to ues the TDX_SYSINFO_MAP() macro to define a structure
for just one 'u64' and define a 'struct tdx_metadata_field_mapping'
table which only has one element for that.
b). TDX_SYSINFO_MAP() macro actually doesn't support taking a metadata
field "variable", but can only support using the name of the metadata field.
However we can try to make 1) as a wrapper of 2). But this would
require some change to the patch 4.
I'll reply separately to patch 4 and you can take a look whether that is
better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists