linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] x86/syscall: Mark exit[_group] syscall handlers _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c2d9a20-d3ff-4cdb-946a-2651ee37e272@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 09:48:19 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] x86/syscall: Mark exit[_group] syscall handlers
 __noreturn

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 04:48:34PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 04:33:00PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Does arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c need the following additional patch?
> > 
> > A quick smoke test passes, but perhaps I am just getting lucky...
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> > index aab31760b4e3e..d9ae910ea6f33 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
> > @@ -14,9 +14,13 @@
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) extern long __ia32_##sym(const struct pt_regs *);
> > +#define __SYSCALL_NORETURN(nr, sym) extern long __noreturn __ia32_##sym(const struct pt_regs *);
> >  #include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
> >  #undef __SYSCALL
> >  
> > +#undef __SYSCALL_NORETURN
> > +#define __SYSCALL_NORETURN __SYSCALL
> > +
> >  #define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) __ia32_##sym,
> >  const sys_call_ptr_t ia32_sys_call_table[] = {
> >  #include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
> 
> Ah, yeah, that looks right.

And the overnight testing went well, so...

For your three patches and this one:

Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>