[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e03c1ea5-2493-4153-98a7-ad1323eba9e8@gmx.com>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 08:11:47 +0930
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Boris Burkov <boris@....io>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix array index in qgroup_auto_inherit()
在 2024/5/4 21:08, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> The "i++" was accidentally left out so it just sets qgids[0] over and
> over.
>
> Fixes: 5343cd9364ea ("btrfs: qgroup: simple quota auto hierarchy for nested subvolumes")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
It is indeed the case, btrfs_qgroup_inherit::groups[] should be the
parent qgroupis the subvolume would be added to.
In fact this can lead to unexpected problems, as the groups[1:] would be
all 0, leading to later find_qgroup_rb() unable to find a qgroup and
cause snapshot creation failure.
IMHO you can also craft a fstest case, where the parent subvolume is
assgined to multiple qgroups, and creating a new subvolume inside that
one, which should lead to subvolume creation failure.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> From static analysis. Untested.
>
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index 2ca6bbc1bcc9..1284e78fffce 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -3121,7 +3121,7 @@ static int qgroup_auto_inherit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> qgids = res->qgroups;
>
> list_for_each_entry(qg_list, &inode_qg->groups, next_group)
> - qgids[i] = qg_list->group->qgroupid;
> + qgids[i++] = qg_list->group->qgroupid;
>
> *inherit = res;
> return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists