[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjW5h_Ic3k9IlGtV@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 21:28:55 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, david@...hat.com,
hanchuanhua@...o.com, hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com,
kasong@...cent.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, surenb@...gle.com,
v-songbaohua@...o.com, willy@...radead.org, xiang@...nel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: remove swap_free() and always use
swap_free_nr()
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 12:27:11PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> swap_free_nr() isn't separate, after this patch, it is the only one left.
> there won't be swap_free() any more. it seems you want to directly
> "rename" it to swap_free()?
Yes. Avoid the pointless suffix if it is the only variant.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists