linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftest: epoll_busy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 17:25:22 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nalramli@...tly.com, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftest: epoll_busy_poll: epoll busy poll
 tests

On Fri, 3 May 2024 16:09:45 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
> > "GEN" is for files which are built for other tests to use.
> > IOW unless there's also a wrapper script under TEST_PROGS
> > (or the C code is itself under TEST_PROGS) this test won't
> > be executed by most CIs.  
> 
> Ah, I see. OK.
> 
> If I decided to go with the kselftest_harness as mentioned below, I'd need
> to include a wrapper script to run the binary with the right cmd line
> arg(s) and put that in TEST_PROGS?

harness or not, the only two real requirements for including in
TEST_PROGS directly is to:
 - return non-zero exit code on failure; and
 - not require any command line arguments.