lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 00:03:11 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, venkataprasad.potturu@....com, 
 Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Syed Saba Kareem <Syed.SabaKareem@....com>, 
 V Sujith Kumar Reddy <vsujithkumar.reddy@....com>, 
 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, 
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, 
 Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>, 
 "open list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, 
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: amd: acp: fix for acp platform device
 creation failure

On Thu, 02 May 2024 19:33:25 +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> ACP pin configuration varies based on acp version.
> ACP PCI driver should read the ACP PIN config value and based on config
> value, it has to create a platform device in below two conditions.
> 1) If ACP PDM configuration is selected from BIOS and ACP PDM controller
> exists.
> 2) If ACP I2S configuration is selected from BIOS.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: amd: acp: fix for acp platform device creation failure
      commit: 09068d624c490c0e89f33f963c402f1859964467
[2/2] ASoC: amd: acp: move chip->flag variable assignment
      (no commit info)

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ