[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pltyrf9l.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 20:01:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ruanjinjie@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/irqdomain: Clean code for __irq_domain_create()
On Tue, Apr 30 2024 at 17:33, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Introduce irq_domain_alloc_name() function to handle name allocation for
> the irq domain, add "out_free_domain" label to free the irq domain, and
> when "is_fwnode_irqchip(fwnode)" is true, "domain->fwnode = fwnode" is
> the common action, so do it outside the switch, which can make the code
> more clearer.
First of all changelogs should describe the reason for the change and
not enumerate a list of things which the patch does. The latter can be
seen from the patch itself.
> +static int irq_domain_alloc_name(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + struct irq_domain *domain,
> + int unknown_domains, char *in_name)
> +{
> + char *name;
> +
> + if (fwnode == NULL) {
> + if (unknown_domains)
> + domain->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "unknown-%d",
> + unknown_domains);
> + else
> + domain->name = kstrdup(in_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!domain->name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * fwnode paths contain '/', which debugfs is legitimately
> + * unhappy about. Replace them with ':', which does
> + * the trick and is not as offensive as '\'...
> + */
> + name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pfw", fwnode);
> + if (!name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + domain->name = strreplace(name, '/', ':');
> +
> +out:
> + domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
> + return 0;
This function is horrible. The only shared thing here is the
domain->flags manipulation. I'm not seeing how this is an improvement.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists