| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:03:55 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, dylanbhatch@...gle.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
ke.wang@...soc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/proc: Print user_cpus_ptr for task status
On 5/6/24 04:04, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:10 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:46:33PM +0800, Xuewen Yan wrote:
>>> The commit 851a723e45d1c("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()")
>>> would clear the user_cpus_ptr when call the do_set_cpus_allowed.
>>>
>>> In order to determine whether the user_cpus_ptr is taking effect,
>>> it is better to print the task's user_cpus_ptr.
>> This is an ABI change and would mandate we forever more have this
>> distinction. I don't think your changes justifies things sufficiently
>> for this.
> I added this mainly because online/offline cpu will produce different
> results for the !top-cpuset task.
>
> For example:
>
> If the task was running, then offline task's cpus, would lead to clear
> its user-mask.
>
> unisoc:/ # while true; do sleep 600; done&
> [1] 6786
> unisoc:/ # echo 6786 > /dev/cpuset/top-app/tasks
> unisoc:/ # cat /dev/cpuset/top-app/cpus
> 0-7
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/6786/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: ff
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-7
> Cpus_user_allowed: (null)
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: (null)
>
> unisoc:/ # taskset -p c0 6786
> pid 6786's current affinity mask: ff
> pid 6786's new affinity mask: c0
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/6786/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: c0
> Cpus_allowed_list: 6-7
> Cpus_user_allowed: c0
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: 6-7
>
> After offline the cpu6 and cpu7, the user-mask would be cleared:
>
> unisoc:/ # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/online
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/6786/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: 40
> Cpus_allowed_list: 6
> Cpus_user_allowed: c0
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: 6-7
> ums9621_1h10:/ # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/online
> ums9621_1h10:/ # cat /proc/6786/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: 3f
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-5
> Cpus_user_allowed: (null)
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: (null)
>
> When online the cpu6/7, the user-mask can not bring back:
>
> unisoc:/ # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/online
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/6786/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: 7f
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-6
> Cpus_user_allowed: (null)
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: (null)
> unisoc:/ # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/online
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/6786/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: ff
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-7
> Cpus_user_allowed: (null)
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: (null)
>
> However, if we offline the cpu when the task is sleeping, at this
> time, because would not call the fallback_cpu(), its user-mask will
> not be cleared.
>
> unisoc:/ # while true; do sleep 600; done&
> [1] 5990
> unisoc:/ # echo 5990 > /dev/cpuset/top-app/tasks
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/5990/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: ff
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-7
> Cpus_user_allowed: (null)
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: (null)
>
> unisoc:/ # taskset -p c0 5990
> pid 5990's current affinity mask: ff
> pid 5990's new affinity mask: c0
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/5990/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: c0
> Cpus_allowed_list: 6-7
> Cpus_user_allowed: c0
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: 6-7
>
> unisoc:/ # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/online
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/5990/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: 80
> Cpus_allowed_list: 7
> Cpus_user_allowed: c0
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: 6-7
> unisoc:/ # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/online
> unisoc:/ # cat /proc/5990/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: 3f
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-5
> Cpus_user_allowed: c0
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: 6-7
>
>
> After 10 minutes, it was waked up, it can also keep its user-mask:
> ums9621_1h10:/ # cat /proc/5990/status | grep Cpus
> Cpus_allowed: 3f
> Cpus_allowed_list: 0-5
> Cpus_user_allowed: c0
> Cpus_user_allowed_list: 6-7
>
> In order to solve the above problem, I modified the following patch.
> At this time, for !top-cpuset, regardless of whether the task is in
> the running state when offline cpu, its cpu-mask can be maintained.
> However, this patch may not be perfect yet, so I send the "Print
> user_cpus_ptr for task status" patch first to debug more conveniently.
>
> --->
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 68cfa656b9b1..00879b6de8d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ extern void dl_bw_free(int cpu, u64 dl_bw);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> /* do_set_cpus_allowed() - consider using set_cpus_allowed_ptr() instead */
> -extern void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct
> cpumask *new_mask);
> +extern void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct
> cpumask *new_mask, bool keep_user);
>
> /**
> * set_cpus_allowed_ptr - set CPU affinity mask of a task
> @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ extern int dl_task_check_affinity(struct
> task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *m
> extern void force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
> extern void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
> #else
> -static inline void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const
> struct cpumask *new_mask)
> +static inline void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const
> struct cpumask *new_mask, bool keep_user)
> {
> }
> static inline int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const
> struct cpumask *new_mask)
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 7ee9994aee40..0c448f8a3829 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -4005,9 +4005,14 @@ bool cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct
> task_struct *tsk)
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> cs_mask = task_cs(tsk)->cpus_allowed;
> - if (is_in_v2_mode() && cpumask_subset(cs_mask, possible_mask)) {
> - do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, cs_mask);
> - changed = true;
> + if (cpumask_subset(cs_mask, possible_mask)) {
> + if (is_in_v2_mode()) {
> + do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, cs_mask, false);
> + changed = true;
> + } else if (task_cs(tsk) != &top_cpuset) {
> + do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, cs_mask, true);
> + changed = true;
> + }
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index 7a7aa5f93c0c..7ede27630088 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static void __kthread_bind_mask(struct task_struct
> *p, const struct cpumask *mas
>
> /* It's safe because the task is inactive. */
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> - do_set_cpus_allowed(p, mask);
> + do_set_cpus_allowed(p, mask, false);
> p->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 33cfd522fc7c..623f89e65e6c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2855,18 +2855,21 @@ __do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
> struct affinity_context *ctx)
> * Used for kthread_bind() and select_fallback_rq(), in both cases the user
> * affinity (if any) should be destroyed too.
> */
> -void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
> +void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask
> *new_mask, bool keep_user)
> {
> struct affinity_context ac = {
> .new_mask = new_mask,
> .user_mask = NULL,
> - .flags = SCA_USER, /* clear the user requested mask */
> + .flags = 0, /* clear the user requested mask */
> };
> union cpumask_rcuhead {
> cpumask_t cpumask;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> + if (!keep_user)
> + ac.flags = SCA_USER;
> +
> __do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
>
> /*
> @@ -2874,7 +2877,8 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
> const struct cpumask *new_mask)
> * to use kfree() here (when PREEMPT_RT=y), therefore punt to using
> * kfree_rcu().
> */
> - kfree_rcu((union cpumask_rcuhead *)ac.user_mask, rcu);
> + if (!keep_user)
> + kfree_rcu((union cpumask_rcuhead *)ac.user_mask, rcu);
> }
>
> static cpumask_t *alloc_user_cpus_ptr(int node)
> @@ -3664,7 +3668,7 @@ int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> *
> * More yuck to audit.
> */
> - do_set_cpus_allowed(p, task_cpu_possible_mask(p));
> + do_set_cpus_allowed(p,
> task_cpu_possible_mask(p), false);
> state = fail;
> break;
> case fail:
>
These changes essentially reverts commit 851a723e45d1c("sched: Always
clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()") except the additional
caller in the cpuset code.
How about the following less invasive change?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7019a40457a6..646837eab70c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2796,21 +2796,24 @@ __do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
struct affinity_context *ctx)
}
/*
- * Used for kthread_bind() and select_fallback_rq(), in both cases the user
- * affinity (if any) should be destroyed too.
+ * Used for kthread_bind() and select_fallback_rq(). Destroy user affinity
+ * if no intersection with the new mask.
*/
void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask
*new_mask)
{
struct affinity_context ac = {
.new_mask = new_mask,
.user_mask = NULL,
- .flags = SCA_USER, /* clear the user requested mask */
+ .flags = 0,
};
union cpumask_rcuhead {
cpumask_t cpumask;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
+ if (current->user_cpus_ptr &&
!cpumask_intersects(current->user_cpus_ptr, new_mask))
+ ac.flags = SCA_USER; /* clear the user requested mask */
+
__do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
/*
No compilation test done. Note that there is a null check inside
kfree_rcu() with no need for additional check.
Regards,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists