Message-ID: <f171eee4-fa70-4374-b6a7-00d4edc03ae5@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 15:11:22 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
 Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
 Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
 Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Move test_dev_cgroup to
 prog_tests


On 5/3/24 6:55 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 4/5/24 1:06 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 4/3/24 5:03 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> On 4/3/24 7:36 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>> On 4/2/24 8:16 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>> Yonghong Song,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you so much for replying. I was missing how to run pipeline
>>>>> manually.
>>>>> Thanks a ton.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/1/24 11:53 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/1/24 5:34 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>>>>> Move test_dev_cgroup.c to prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c to be able to run it
>>>>>>> with test_progs. Replace dev_cgroup.bpf.o with skel header file,
>>>>>>> dev_cgroup.skel.h and load program from it accourdingly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       ./test_progs -t dev_cgroup
>>>>>>>       mknod: /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null: Operation not permitted
>>>>>>>       64+0 records in
>>>>>>>       64+0 records out
>>>>>>>       32768 bytes (33 kB, 32 KiB) copied, 0.000856684 s, 38.2 MB/s
>>>>>>>       dd: failed to open '/dev/full': Operation not permitted
>>>>>>>       dd: failed to open '/dev/random': Operation not permitted
>>>>>>>       #72     test_dev_cgroup:OK
>>>>>>>       Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>>>> - Replace test_dev_cgroup with serial_test_dev_cgroup as there is
>>>>>>>       probability that the test is racing against another cgroup test
>>>>>>> - Minor changes to the commit message above
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've tested the patch with vmtest.sh on bpf-next/for-next and linux
>>>>>>> next. It is passing on both. Not sure why it was failed on BPFCI.
>>>>>>> Test run with vmtest.h:
>>>>>>> sudo LDLIBS=-static PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config --static' ./vmtest.sh
>>>>>>> ./test_progs -t dev_cgroup
>>>>>>> ./test_progs -t dev_cgroup
>>>>>>> mknod: /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null: Operation not permitted
>>>>>>> 64+0 records in
>>>>>>> 64+0 records out
>>>>>>> 32768 bytes (33 kB, 32 KiB) copied, 0.000403432 s, 81.2 MB/s
>>>>>>> dd: failed to open '/dev/full': Operation not permitted
>>>>>>> dd: failed to open '/dev/random': Operation not permitted
>>>>>>>      #69      dev_cgroup:OK
>>>>>>> Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>>>>>> The CI failure:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Error: #72 dev_cgroup
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:cgroup_setup_and_join 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:bpf_attach 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:bpf_query 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:bpf_query 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:rm 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:mknod 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:rm 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:rm 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:FAIL:mknod unexpected mknod: actual 256 !=
>>>>>> expected 0
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:rm 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:dd 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:dd 0 nsec
>>>>>> serial_test_dev_cgroup:PASS:dd 0 nsec
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (cgroup_helpers.c:353: errno: Device or resource busy) umount cgroup2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error code 256 means mknod execution has some issues. Maybe you
>>>>>> need to
>>>>>> find specific errno to find out what is going on. I think you can do ci
>>>>>> on-demanding test to debug.
>>>>> errno is 2 --> No such file or directory
>>>>>
>>>>> Locally I'm unable to reproduce it until I don't remove
>>>>> rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero such that the /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero
>>>>> node is present before test execution. The error code is 256 with errno 2.
>>>>> I'm debugging by placing system("ls /tmp 1>&2"); to find out which files
>>>>> are already present in /tmp. But ls's output doesn't appear on the CI
>>>>> logs.
>>>> errno 2 means ENOENT.
>>>>   From mknod man page (https://linux.die.net/man/2/mknod), it means
>>>>     A directory component in/pathname/  does not exist or is a dangling
>>>> symbolic link.
>>>>
>>>> It means /tmp does not exist or a dangling symbolic link.
>>>> It is indeed very strange. To make the test robust, maybe creating a temp
>>>> directory with mkdtemp and use it as the path? The temp directory
>>>> creation should be done before bpf prog attach.
>>> I've tried following but still no luck:
>>> * /tmp is already present. Then I thought maybe the desired file is already
>>> present. I've verified that there isn't file of same name is present inside
>>> /tmp.
>>> * I thought maybe mknod isn't present in the system. But mknod --help
>>> succeeds.
>>> * I switched from /tmp to current directory to create the mknod. But the
>>> result is same error.
>>> * I've tried to use the same kernel config as the BPF CI is using. I'm not
>>> able to reproduce it.
>>>
>>> Not sure which edge case or what's going on. The problem is appearing
>>> because of some limitation in the rootfs.
>> Maybe you could collect /tmp mount options to see whether anything is
>> suspicious? In my vm, I have
>>    tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,size=3501540k,nr_inodes=1048576)
>> and the test works fine.
>>
>>
> My test system:
> tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
>
> On the CI, /tmp is present. But it isn't tmpfs. Following shows the logs
> from /proc/mounts
>
> On CI:
>    /dev/root / 9p
> rw,relatime,cache=f,access=client,msize=512000,trans=virtio 0 0
>    devtmpfs /dev devtmpfs
> rw,relatime,size=1998612k,nr_inodes=499653,mode=755 0 0
>    tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0
>    proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
>    tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0
>    tmpfs /run/netns tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0
>    sys /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
>    debugfs /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,relatime 0 0
>    tracefs /sys/kernel/debug/tracing tracefs rw,relatime 0 0
>    cgroup2 /sys/fs/cgroup cgroup2 rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
>    tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0

somthing wrong here. /sys/fs/cgroup cannot be both cgroup2
and tmpfs types.

>    net_cls /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls cgroup rw,relatime,net_cls 0 0
>    tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
>    net_cls /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls cgroup rw,relatime,net_cls 0 0
>    tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
>    net_cls /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls cgroup rw,relatime,net_cls 0 0
>    bpffs /sys/fs/bpf bpf rw,relatime 0 0
>    bpf /sys/fs/bpf bpf rw,relatime 0 0
>    tmpfs /mnt tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0
>    vmtest-shared /mnt/vmtest 9p
> rw,relatime,cache=f,access=client,msize=512000,trans=virtio 0 0
>    none /mnt cgroup2 rw,relatime 0 0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists