lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506185020.2f156bc8@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 18:50:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>, Masami Hiramatsu
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Guo Ren
 <guoren@...nel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui
 <kernel@...0n.name>, "James E.J. Bottomley"
 <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>, "Naveen N. Rao"
 <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger
 <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas
 Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav
 Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
 "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
 "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
 "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kprobe/ftrace: bail out if ftrace was killed

On Mon, 6 May 2024 14:46:57 +0000
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:

> Isn't it safer to provide a fonction rather than a direct access to a 
> variable ?
> 
> By the way, wouldn't it be more performant to use a static branch (jump 
> label) ?

A static branch could work, but the point of this is that if ftrace
failed, it was likely due to an issue with text modification. Do we want to
stop it via text modification?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ