[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYn+jpGWDcWDUL5yj-pG_oBMLpFO-QhX6Sa-XzJNmhZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 08:21:41 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
lvzhaoxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>, Joel Selvaraj <jo@...amily.in>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:26 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> So I guess I'd say that I ended up being pretty happy with the
> "context" even if it does feel a little over engineered and I'd argue
> to keep it that way. That being said, if you feel strongly about it
> then we can perhaps get others to chime in to see which style they
> prefer? Let me know what you think.
I'm in favor of this design.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists