[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1615fe92-d4ff-4ef2-9bd0-199aa9e3a426@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 09:25:01 +0200
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
"josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "jack@...e.com" <jack@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 16/16] nvme-pci: use blk_rq_dma_map() for NVMe SGL
On 05.05.24 15:23, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 04:41:21PM +0200, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> On 05.03.24 12:18, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
> <...>
>
>>> This is an RFC to demonstrate the newly added DMA APIs can be used to
>>> map/unmap bvecs without the use of sg list, hence I've modified the pci
>>> code to only handle SGLs for now. Once we have some agreement on the
>>> structure of new DMA API I'll add support for PRPs along with all the
>>> optimization that I've removed from the code for this RFC for NVMe SGLs
>>> and PRPs.
>>>
> <...>
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>>> index e6267a6aa380..140939228409 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>>> @@ -236,7 +236,9 @@ struct nvme_iod {
>>> unsigned int dma_len; /* length of single DMA segment mapping */
>>> dma_addr_t first_dma;
>>> dma_addr_t meta_dma;
>>> - struct sg_table sgt;
>>> + struct dma_iova_attrs iova;
>>> + dma_addr_t dma_link_address[128];
>> Why the length of this array is 128? Can we increase this length of the
>> array?
> It is combination of two things:
> * Good enough value for this nvme RFC to pass simple test, which Chaitanya did.
> * Output of various NVME_CTRL_* defines
Thanks a lot. I enlarged this number to 512. It seems that it can work.
Hope this will increase the performance.
Best Regards,
Zhu Yanjun
>
> Thanks
--
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists