linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix and cleanups to page-writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 09:25:01 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
 hcochran@...nelspring.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mszeredi@...hat.com,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix and cleanups to page-writeback

Hi Tejun,

on 5/2/2024 12:16 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:17:20PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> v1->v2:
>> -rebase on up-to-date tree.
>> -add test result in "mm: correct calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup
>> domain"
>> -drop "mm: remove redundant check in wb_min_max_ratio"
>> -collect RVB from Matthew to "mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty"
>>
>> This series contains some random cleanups and a fix to correct
>> calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup domain. More details can
>> be found respective patches. Thanks!
> 
> Isn't this series already in -mm? Why is this being reposted? What tree is
> this based on? Please provide more context to help reviewing the patches.
> 
Sorry for late reply as I was on vacation these days. This series is based
on mm-unstable and was applied into -mm mm-unstable branch after this v2
series was posted.
Thanks
> Thanks.
>