[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bbfdaa6-c212-64eb-702f-7a8e18af2c67@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 09:36:16 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] writeback use [global/wb]_domain_dirty_avail helper
in cgwb_calc_thresh
on 5/2/2024 12:56 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:47:32AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> Use [global/wb]_domain_dirty_avail helper in cgwb_calc_thresh to remove
>> repeated code.
>
> Maybe fold this into the patch to factor out domain_dirty_avail()?
>
>> + global_domain_dirty_avail(&gdtc, false);
>> + wb_domain_dirty_avail(&mdtc, false);
>
> I'd just use domain_dirty_avail(). The compiler should be able to figure out
> the branches and eliminate them and it removes an unnecessary source of
> error.
Sure, will this do this in next version.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists