linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/mediatek: Add support for OF graphs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 12:02:16 +0200
From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 "Alexandre Mergnat" <amergnat@...libre.com>, <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc: <robh@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <airlied@...il.com>,
 <daniel@...ll.ch>, <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 <mripard@...nel.org>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>, <yu-chang.lee@...iatek.com>,
 <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
 <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/mediatek: Add support for OF graphs

Hi Angelo,

On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 1:33 PM CEST, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >> This series was tested on MT8195 Cherry Tomato and on MT8395 Radxa
> >> NIO-12L with both hardcoded paths, OF graph support and partially
> >> hardcoded paths (meaning main display through OF graph and external
> >> display hardcoded, because of OVL_ADAPTOR).
> > 
> > Is that make sense for you to add the DTS changes of these boards into this serie ?
> > I asked because, IMHO, that could help to understand the serie.
> > 
>
> Yes and no... but I imagine that you're asking this because you're trying to
> prepare something with a different SoC+board(s) combination :-)
>
> In that case, I'm preventively sorry because what follows here is not 100%
> perfectly tidy yet as I didn't mean to send the devicetree commits upstream
> before this series got picked....
>
> ... but there you go - I'm sure that you won't mind and that the example will
> be more than good enough for you.

I've tested this series with the DSI0 output and it works. Nice! No
need for my DSI0 patch for the MT8395 anymore.

But I can't get it to work with the DisplayPort output, that is the
dp_intf1/dp_tx interface. I don' know how the pipeline have to look
like. The functional spec seems to be ambiguous on this. The text
seem to refer to the second vdosys but there is also a diagram where
you can use the first vdosys and dsc0. If you have any pointers for
me, I'm all ears :)

-michael